EuroScrape

← All articles

A month after registration, 18% of new Manchester companies have a website, up from 15% in their first week - how long a “no website” lead stays a lead

11 October 2026EuroScrapeBuilt on real runs, every figure dated

cover

Every lead list of “businesses without a website” raises the same question: for how long is that true? A company registered last week has not had time to build anything. A company registered a year ago and still without a site has probably decided it does not need one. Somewhere between the two is the moment a lead is worth a call.

On 11 October 2026 I ran the No-Website Leads Actor twice on the same place, Manchester, with output: "all" so that every new company is returned with its website status, not only the leads. Two samples of 150 companies each, taken from the UK register (Companies House):

Same city, same register, same method, one month apart. Here is what moved.

What moved in a month

Website status Week A (4-10 days old) Week B (34-40 days old)
No website, no domain at the company’s name 79 (53%) 74 (49%)
A domain exists, nothing usable on it 38 (25%) 35 (23%)
A website, tied to the company 23 (15%) 27 (18%)
A real page on an older domain, not attributable 10 (7%) 14 (9%)

Four companies out of 150 gained a website in a month. The share without any domain fell from 53% to 49%. Everything else is noise at this sample size.

Two readings of the same table:

The domain signal

The field I watch most is domainRecent: the domain at the company’s name was created within a few weeks of the registration, and nothing is on it yet. Someone paid for the name and has not built the site. In week A that was 24 companies out of 150; in week B, 20. So about one company in seven buys its domain in the first days, and most of them have still not built anything a month later.

What sits on those registered domains, by week:

Page on the registered domain Week A Week B
No response at all 20 17
Empty page (server answers, nothing on it) 8 11
Registrar’s parking page 10 7

Who they are

In both weeks the most common activity by far is retail sale via mail order houses or via Internet (SIC 47910): 27 companies in week A, 24 in week B. These are online shops in the making, registered before the shop exists. Then come software development and IT consultancy (62012, 62020), take-away food shops (56103), management consultancy (70229) and, in week B, cleaning services (81210) and advertising agencies (73110). No names here: the dataset carries them, with the registered office, the SIC codes and the Companies House link.

What this does not say

How to do it

{
  "countries": ["UK"],
  "ukLocations": ["Manchester"],
  "registeredFrom": "2026-09-01",
  "registeredTo": "2026-09-07",
  "output": "all",
  "maxItems": 150
}

One run per week studied, about 90 seconds and under half a cent of platform usage each on the author’s account. Leads cost $0.005 each; with output: "all" the companies that do have a website cost $0.002. For a lead list rather than a study, leave output on its default (noWebsite), or set it to newDomain to get only the companies whose domain was just bought: the hottest ones.

Disclosure: the Actor is built by the author of this article.

Part of the EuroScrape actor collection — all articles.

Run these numbers yourself. Every EuroScrape Actor runs on Apify, pay per result, first results free. Open the Store page →